top of page

Sameer Gudhate Presents the Book Review of Desiccated Land by David Lepeska

  • Writer: Sameer Gudhate
    Sameer Gudhate
  • 19 hours ago
  • 3 min read

I remember closing this book one evening and realising the room around me felt louder than before. The fan hummed. A dog barked somewhere far away. And yet, after Desiccated Land, silence carried weight. This is not the silence of peace. It is the kind that lingers after you’ve heard too much truth at once and don’t know where to place it.

 

David Lepeska comes to Kashmir not as a saviour, not as an expert parachuted in with opinions ready-made, but as a young American journalist trying to learn how to listen. His early reporting days at Kashmir Observer form the spine of this book, but what grows around that spine is something far more intimate. This is reportage that slowly sheds its armour and becomes reflection. A record of a place, yes—but also a record of what it does to a person who stays long enough to feel unsettled.

 

The premise is deceptively simple. Lepeska gathers his reporting, revisits it years later, and asks what it all meant. But the experience of reading it is anything but simple. Page after page, the book pulls you into daily life in a conflict zone without theatrics. No dramatic background music. No forced outrage. Just streets, schools, conversations, statistics that refuse to remain abstract, and people trying to live with a normalcy that keeps slipping away.

 

What struck me most about the narrative is how it reads like fragments of a non-fiction novel. The prose doesn’t rush. It observes. There’s a patience to Lepeska’s writing—a willingness to let discomfort sit on the page. His style blends journalistic rigour with the intimacy of a diary and the wandering curiosity of a travelogue. The pacing mirrors the Valley itself: long stretches of uneasy calm, followed by moments where everything tightens.

 

The book’s greatest strength lies in its focus on the long-term human impact of violence. Not just the visible scars—damaged infrastructure, disrupted education—but the quieter erosion of culture, trust, and mental well-being. At one point, the sheer scale of trauma becomes impossible to ignore. Depression and PTSD aren’t side notes here; they are part of the atmosphere. You feel it when children can’t play freely, when young people grow up with curtailed futures, when fear becomes routine rather than exceptional.

 

There is no single “character” in the conventional sense, yet Kashmir itself emerges as one—complex, wounded, resilient, and exhausted. Lepeska’s foreignness never disappears, and that honesty matters. He doesn’t pretend to fully belong. Instead, he reflects on what it means to witness suffering without owning it, to report on lives that continue long after the journalist leaves. That tension gives the book its emotional charge.

 

Structurally, the book moves between reportage, memory, and later assessment. This back-and-forth creates a layered effect. You see events as they happened, then feel their aftershocks years later. The transformation is subtle but powerful: not of the land alone, but of the author’s understanding. Global geopolitics, Indian and US policies, statist narratives—all appear, but never overwhelm the human stories at the centre.

 

Reading Desiccated Land is not comfortable. There are moments when the objectivity and unflinching tone make it almost unbearable, especially for readers who prefer softer versions of reality. That may be its quiet weakness and its moral strength at once. This is not a book that offers solutions. In fact, one of its most haunting suggestions is that too many people benefit from the conflict continuing, ensuring that the fire never quite goes out.

 

Emotionally, I found myself pausing often. Not because the book was difficult to read stylistically, but because it demanded reflection. It made me question how conflicts are consumed—as headlines, as debates, as distant tragedies—and what gets lost when we stop at surface narratives. The impact lingers long after the last page, like dust you carry home on your clothes without noticing at first.

 

This is a literary work for readers who value depth over drama, nuance over noise. It suits a slow reading mood, preferably when you’re willing to sit with unease rather than rush past it. Its shelf life feels long, because the questions it raises—about representation, responsibility, and memory—do not age quickly.

 

If there is one image that stayed with me, it is this: a land described not through slogans, but through accumulated weight, like soil drying under an unrelenting sun. Desiccated Land doesn’t shout. It waits. And in that waiting, it asks you to look, really look, at what decades of unresolved conflict do to ordinary lives.

 

If you’re willing to face that truth, this book will meet you halfway—and stay with you longer than you expect.

 

 

Comments


Follow

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

©2020 by My Site. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page